KZ;273119 wrote: I'm waiting for the supermoto version with better brakes and different gearing for a better top speed.
As much as I admire Kawasaki for introducing reasonably priced 250 and 650cc bikes to Thailand I think they dropped the ball with the 250 singles.
monsterman;273124 wrote: It will probably be a better bike than the Kwak on quality alone lets hope it comes at a sensible price.
KZ;273135 wrote: With 'dropping the ball' I meant that the 250 singles are underpowered. I simply wouldn't buy a bike that has way less power than its carbed predecessors and the competition. The XR250 motor makes something around 28hp (not sure if they are rear-wheel or not) and Yamaha's WR250 puts out maybe 50% more (okay, it's more expensive).
Restricted top gears? A bike I can't rev out on the highway? Stalling problems at idle? No, thank you. I'm waiting for something better to be offered.
Shelling out extra money for an ICU (from Kawasaki!) and loose my warranty? Sorry, no!
I don't want to buy a new bike and get to work on it to make it run the way it should from the factory.
How come Honda can produce a 250 with 24 rear-wheel horses? Why was the Kawasaki neutered in the first place?
KZ;273135 wrote:
Aren't the frames welded and isn't the paint applied in Japan? As far as I understand the bikes only get assembled here.
TonyBKK;273138 wrote: Sorry, that's wrong mate- to meet BOI rules Thai manufactured products have to contain a minimum of 80% Thai manufactured components by value. All of the frames in Thai manufactured Kawasaki motorcycles are manufactured in Thailand.
I'll check that out next time I'm at the dealer!TonyBKK;273138 wrote: If you get right down and LOOK at the frame welds on a Thai manufactured frame and them compare them to the frame welds on a Japanese manufactured frame you'll see quite clearly that Japan still has better build quality than Thailand.
Honda can build a 24hp 250 single that passes emissions - why can't Kawasaki?LivinLOS;273136 wrote: But those are Thai emissions issues not maker issues IMO.. Without the regs they could do far better.
Does the WR have either the Thai type approval or a similar dual sport / road use maintenance schedule ?? Does an old carb XR pass the current Euro III ??
I understand your gripe.. But dont see it as the makers fault. Their hands are tied.
KZ;273157 wrote: Honda can build a 24hp 250 single that passes emissions - why can't Kawasaki?
I'd have to disagree.TonyBKK;273127 wrote:
To me it's Honda that's dropped the ball with their overweight underpowered CB'r' thumper dressed up to look like a sport bike... Lose all that silly plastic and call it a CB250 and you've got an interesting bike IMO![]()
Honda did have issues supplying parts in the beginning, due to the surprising high demand (that's what said in the BK Post anyway). I Haven't heard of any parts not being available for a long long time.TonyBKK;273129 wrote:
Plenty of complaints already about the new Thai / India produced CB'r' 250. Seems it's a pretty fragile bike, by Honda standards anyway. And from day 1 Honda has had big problems supplying parts for their new baby CB'r'...
Not quite true.The Honda CB'r' Engine Rattle has been well documented but still not solved:
http://www.cbr250.net/forum/cbr250-problems-issues/1561-engine-rattle-sign-up-11.html